Book a call →
HubSpot Reporting and Analytics

The best time to fix the definitions is before you build the dashboard.

We build HubSpot reporting for teams that need numbers leadership will actually use. Definitions and data model come before dashboards, so a report holds up when someone asks how a number was calculated. The dashboards nobody opens usually skipped one of those steps.

What we're noticing

Reporting always looks like a dashboard problem. It's usually a definitions problem.

The pattern

Reporting gets built in a hurry. Someone stands up a dashboard on top of the default reports, drops in a few charts, and ships it. It looks complete. Then the questions start. Sales counts a lead one way, marketing counts it another, and the two numbers never quite meet. Leadership asks for the funnel and gets three versions of it.

So the dashboard stops being the answer. People export to a spreadsheet to check the figure before they trust it. The data is all there. The agreement about what it means is not.

What we do

Reporting work with us starts before a single chart is built. We agree what your KPIs are, who needs them, and how often. Then we settle the definitions underneath: what counts as a lead, when a deal is qualified, when a meeting counts as booked. The properties and lifecycle stages in HubSpot get configured to support those definitions, not the defaults.

The work is technical. The conversations are consultative. By the time the dashboards go live, they reflect how your business measures itself, and the numbers reconcile across teams. Not a wall of charts. A view leadership can run the business on.

Why teams hire us

When teams usually bring us in.

01

Before something new goes live.

A migration is finishing, a new fiscal year is starting, or a board reporting rhythm is about to begin. You want reporting built for the questions you're about to be asked, not stitched together after the first cycle.

02

New people, or new leadership.

A new head of sales, a new CFO, or a new board seat asking questions the current reporting can't answer. You want a view that holds up under scrutiny, not three versions of the funnel emailed around before every meeting.

03

The dashboards launched. The trust didn't.

Reports don't reconcile, so leadership exports to a spreadsheet before they'll quote a number. Everyone's technically got the dashboards, but nobody trusts them, and building another one on the same foundation isn't going to change that.

WHAT'S INCLUDED

A reporting build scoped to the Hubs you use and the questions leadership actually asks.

01 /

KPI alignment and reporting map

What leadership and each team actually need to know, who needs it, and how often. Reporting gets designed against those questions, not against HubSpot's default dashboards.

02 /

Definitions and metric governance

What counts as a lead, an MQL, an opportunity, a booked meeting, a churn risk. Agreed once, documented, and applied consistently, so the same number means the same thing in every view.

03 /

Data and lifecycle review

Properties, lifecycle stages, and source data checked so reporting is built on accurate inputs. What would distort the numbers gets fixed before anything gets built on top of it.

04 /

Leadership dashboards

The two or three views leadership opens weekly. Pipeline coverage, source contribution, conversion velocity. Built to answer the questions leadership actually asks, not to fill a screen.

05 /

Team dashboards

Sales, marketing, and service views scoped to what each team owns. The numbers reconcile with the leadership view because they use the same definitions.

06 /

Funnel and pipeline reporting

Visibility across conversion, velocity, and drop-off. Where deals stall, where leads leak, and what that's costing in pipeline terms.

07 /

Attribution and campaign reporting

Where relevant, what's driving pipeline rather than just clicks and opens. Marketing activity mapped to pipeline created, with the attribution limits stated plainly.

08 /

Training and handover

Documentation your team owns, and a walkthrough scoped to roles. Reporting your team can maintain and evolve without us.

TIMELINE

A standard reporting build runs three to six weeks. Larger portals and multi-team rollouts run longer.

Week 1

Alignment

KPI map and definitions. We agree what matters, who needs it, and what each metric means. The build doesn't start until the definitions are settled.

Week 2

Data review

Properties, lifecycle stages, and source data checked and corrected, so reporting sits on inputs that hold up.

Weeks 3–4

Build

Leadership and team dashboards, funnel and pipeline reporting, attribution where relevant. Built in order, so each view rests on the layer beneath it.

Weeks 5–6

Validation and handover

Numbers checked against reality, documentation written, and a walkthrough scoped to roles. Your team leaves with reporting they can maintain without us.

Before and After

What changes when reporting is built on definitions, not defaults.

Dimension Before After
Definitions
Everyone counts a lead differently.

One agreed definition, applied consistently.

Trust
Leadership exports to a spreadsheet to check the figure.

Leadership quotes the dashboard number in the meeting.

Dashboards
Twenty reports, no agreement on which is right.

A handful of views the team runs on.

Data
Numbers don't reconcile across teams.

The same number comes out of every view.

Attribution
Clicks and opens, no link to pipeline.

Marketing activity mapped to the pipeline it created, limits stated.

Handover
Reporting lives in one person's head.

Documentation your team maintains without us.

Case · SaaS · VIC
A new CMO's reporting method, implemented for the fifth time.
CASE STUDY

A reporting method we'd already built four times.

A B2B SaaS business hired a new CMO who arrived with a reporting approach they'd used before. We knew it well. We'd built the same method into HubSpot for four of their previous clients, so the definitions, the funnel structure, and the views were settled before the first call.

That made the work quick. The CMO's definitions were the brief. Properties, lifecycle stages, and source data were reconfigured to support them, and the historical data was reviewed against the new definitions before anything got built on top. Nothing had to be worked out on the fly. HubSpot just had to catch up to a system both sides had already run together.